Supreme Court Rejected Shaikh Rasheed’s Petition To Conduct Election in NA-60 as Scheduled

We could not understand the logic behind rejecting Shaikh Rasheed’s petition by the supreme court to have the election in the NA-60 constituency as planned.

Yesterday, Islamabad High Court gave the verdicts similar to this.

We also don’t approve the satirical remarks by the chief justice that Shaikh Rasheed is contesting the election from another constituency also we will see his popularity or his election results over there. This is not the prerogative of the chief justice to comment on Shaikh Rasheed’s ability or anybody else for that matter to win or not to win the election. We believe this is a political statement. If chief justice doesn’t like him don’t vote for him.

The reason for rejecting the petition, we learned through news media is that the people of the constituency should not be deprived of electing their representative. In other words, we conclude that chief justice wants Sharif mafia’s representative should participate in the election from that constituency. We don’t think this is the chief justice to ask or expect or ensure Sharif mafia or any other political party must nominate his candidate in any given constituency.

We believe this is wrong and against the constitution. If we accept the chief justice’s logic of not conducting the election simply because Sharif mafia’s candidate Hanif Abbasi has been disqualified for election then why the same principle did not apply to other constituencies, of Maryam Nawaz, Mohd Safdar both of Sharif mafia party (PMLN) and Manzoor Wasan (PPP). That proves there is an anomaly in the verdict of the supreme court.

We are afraid supreme court will let the nation down by not giving the verdicts according to the constitution and its equal application to everyone.

Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz are Getting Ready to Fly to London?

A news channel is running a ticker that Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz are getting ready to fly out to London.

Are they going to declare death of Kalsoom Nawaz? May be. That could be a good excuse to get out of the jail and leave Pakistan. Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz’s names are not on ECL (exit control list). As everybody knows the present care-taker government is an extension of Sharif mafia and its previous government. You know how the care-taker prime minister was selected. Leaders of two mafias namely Sharif-Zardari mafia jointly agree on the name of justice retired Nasirul Mulk. This retired chief justice is the same person who did not see any rigging and did not investigate frauds of Nawaz Sharif mafia in election 2013 and cleared the elections and Nawaz Sharif. You can see when such dishonest persons make the decisions of the fate of a nation what will be result.

Unfortunately, present chief justice also have a softcorner for Sharifs. On June 9, 2018  NAB refused to allow Sharifs to travel out of the country. But on June 11, 2018 chief justice Saqib Nisar by himself without any request from Nawaz Sharif or Mayam Nawaz asked them they can go to celebrate Eid in London.

If Sharifs accounce the death of Kalsoom Nawaz then It will not surpeise us if chief justice himself ask him to go to London and visit him in the jail to offer his condolence along with care-taker prime minister and Punjab chief minister.

Can you imagine how far and deep these mafias have penetrated in the State affairs.

Kalsoom Nawaz is Alive or Dead?


Kalsoom Nawaz in a Hospital Bed in London

We believe Kalsoom Nawaz is brain-dead but kept alive using a ventilator.

Sharifs may officially announce about her death a week or ten days before the election date 25 July 2018 expecting to get the sympathy vote. They believe Peoples Party won the 2008 election by getting the sympathy vote because of the murder of Benazir.

Another parallel strategy is to keep Kalsoon Nawaz on a ventilator and alive if she is alive.

People in the know believe Sharif mafia will use the death of Kalsoom Nawaz for their political gains. No doubt about that. Another objective of Nawaz Sharif is how to avoid arrest.

A couple of weeks ago first time news of her death was rampant in the social and news media. It was said this news has come from an Indian source. Since the Sharif family is very close to Indians so this news is believable.

Malala Yousif Zai is a Fraud – A Shame for Nobel Committee

malala_yousifzai

Malala Yousafzai

Malala Yousafzai 20, is a fraud, anybody who has a doubt, ask her and her Western supporters what she has done for which Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to her.

The only thing we are told again by the Western media that she has worked for the promotion of education for girls.

Where, in which country she has worked for this cause
What work she has done
How many school or educational institutions she has established for girls or for anybody

We know for fact, in Pakistan she has done nothing for the education. We heard through Western media that she used to right a blog. In Pakistan we never heard about that so we wonder what affect that blog had on, if any on the educational policies of Pakistan’s government or anyhwere in the world. May be this blog story was invented later.

Malala Yousafzai was 14 years old when Taliban attacked the van where she was travelling with other students. So all these deeds which Western media enlighted us and Nobel Committee took notice of was done before that. The other three girls who were injured with her, nobody even talked about them.

No body knew Malala Yousafzai in Pakistan or in the world until Western media and George Brown then the prime minsiter of UK told us that she has done great service to humanity at the age of 14.

This is all game of investment of money in propaganda and public relations. That works. Who put the money for propaganda and public relations for her they have vested interests in her.

This is important that we should repeat and tell the truth to our people so they know we don’t have any respect for fluke and fake people.

Can you compare Malala Yousafzai with Abdul Sattar Edhi or even Imran Khan who has build world class cancer research and treatment hospital which had pronounced affect on the lives of Pakistani people and established two world class universities. All this was done by his own money and donations.

Can Malala Yousafzai put her hand on her heart and say honestly that she has done anything which Western media has been propagating for her. Obviously she is a fraud and West’s agent.

Shame on Malala Yousifzai.

 

Chaudary Nisar Ali Khan vs Nawaz Sharif

Chaudary_Nisar_Ali_Khan

Chaudary Nisar Ali Khan, Interior Minister of Pakistan

On Friday (July 21, 2017) it was announced that Ch. Nisar Ali Khan will address a press conference on Sunday July 23, 2017 at 5 pm to explain his position on his tense relations with Nawaz Sharif (present prime minister). But today just two hours before the press conference time it was announced that press conference has been postponed till Monday because of his ill health. Earlier it was reported he is sick because of his back pain. Some people in Nawaz League are saying press conference was postponed at their request.

During the last few weeks he has not been attending any meeting of Nawaz League. It was said he had serious differences on the policy matters with Nawaz Sharif regarding handling of Panama case particularly presenting Qatari letter in supreme court and its expected decision by the supreme court.

There is a strong possibility that Nawaz Sharif will be disqualified as member of the parliament and prime minister. Nawaz Sharif himself and his ministers namely both Khawajas, Saad Rafiq and Asif, Khaqan Abbasi, Ahsan Iqbal and his other cronies have openly said if Nawaz Sharif is disqualified they will not accept the supreme court decision. We don’t know exactly what they will do and how Nawaz Sharif will still stay as prime minister when he will be disqualified. In other words Nawaz Sharif and his close advisor (his kitchen cabinet) are thinking to go for confrontation with supreme court and possibly create a situation where Pak Army has to interfere.

Will Nawaz Sharif succeed in his retaliatory moves? Absolutely not. He is just uttering words which have no sense in Punjabi called barrak.

Earlier, Khawaja Saad Rafiq, Daniyal Aziz, Talal Chaudary, Asif Kirmani made very flamboyant and derogatory statements against supreme court and JIT members. Supreme Court has acquired the transcripts of their speeches and statements. The case against Nihal Hashmi is in progress in the supreme court when he threatened JIT and supreme court justices.

Now it is said that Ch. Nisar Ali Khan is not agree with Nawaz Sharif and his close advisors to go in confrontation with supreme court, army or any other civilian institution. That is why he is angry with Nawaz Sharif and have not been participating in cabinet or or the Nawaz League meetings. However, he did advised Nawaz Sharif not to accept JIT.

It is known fact Ch. Nisar Ali Khan hate Khawaja Asif and Ahsan Iqbal and is not on talking terms with each of them. Shahbaz Sharif, Khawaja Saad Rafiq, Ayaz Sadiq, Rana Tanveer went to see Ch. Nisar Ali Khan to change his stance and attend the meetings but all in vain.

Is Ch. Nisar Ali really going to have a press conference on Monday as announced, it is too early to say. Let us see what he has to say.

Nawaz Sharif, Panama Case and Supreme Court

pakistan_supreme_court

What would be the decision by the Supreme Court.

We don’t know.

What we know is Supreme Court of Pakistan has never given any verdict against Nawaz Sharif. This is a matter of fact. Is this time going to be different. Yes, it may be a little different. Not because the judiciary is more independent but people know more than what is presented to the Bench. Credit goes to Imran Khan and TV media channels

You have watched a lot of TV programs and analysis of so called self appointed senior analysts including who are on the payroll of Nawaz Sharif. So it is not the time to go back to argue on the proceedings of the case or the analysis of analysts or experts.

Here is what we think how the decision may look like.

In few hours time decision of the Panama Case will be announced by the Supreme Court so instead of going into details let us be objective and go straight to the point.

There are three petitioners in the Panama Case.

Imran Khan, Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf
Sirajul Haq, Jama’at Islami
Shaikh Rasheed Ahmed, Awami Muslim League

The four defendants from Sharif family are Hasan Nawaz, Hussain Nawaz, Mariam Nawaz (or Mariam Safdar) and Nawaz Sharif himself.

Let us go one by one about their submissions. Simplest to more comprehensive.

Shaikh Rasheed Ahmed’s plea is very simple and straight forward. He prayed that Nawaz Sharif’s statements made on the TV while addressing two times to nation explaining the trail of money to buy London flats do not match with what he said in the Parliament. On top of that his lawyers in the Supreme Court said they don’t have any record of money transfer to purchase the flats in London other than two letters from Qatari prince. That is the proof Nawaz Sharif lied to the nation, lied in the Parliament and hide the truth in front of the court, Shaikh Rasheed stated. Therefore, Nawaz Sharif should be disqualified for the membership of the Parliament under Article 62 and 63. Hence will be removed from the prime ministership.  Shaikh Rasheed submitted a list of 22 national assembly members who were disqualified on the basis of lying and dishonesty, Article 62 and 63.

What Supreme Court can decide on this point. 

Option 1. Supreme Court can agree with Shaikh Rasheed’s arguments and declare that yes Nawaz Sharif lied and hide the facts from Supreme Court. If that verdict is given. That will be a major blow to Nawaz Sharif’s position. And that will be deviation from the previous practice of Supreme Court supporting Nawaz Sharif.

Option 2. Supreme Court does not say clearly that Nazwaz Sharif lied for his face saving purpose and suggest there are discrepancies in his statements and other evidence provided by the defendant therefore Court suggests that Nawaz Sahrif should resign and stay away until the Commission completes his investigation. This will be less harsh verdict and give some ammunition to PMLN’s GGBrigde (members of the party who uses very abusive language. They collect the salary from public funds but personally serve their master).

Option 3. is that Supreme Court does not do anything and throw the monkey on Commission’s shoulder. There is least chance of taking this option by the Supreme Court.

Sirajul Haq’s petition is that action should be taken against all the people who’s names have appeared in the Panama Papers, loan defaulters, money launderers and involved in corruption should be punished.

What Supreme Court can decide on this point.

This requires investigation therefore chances are Supreme Court will announce to form a commission and hand over all these issues to this commission. Easy way out.

Imran Khan’s petition is the most comprehensive on allegations against Nawaz Sharif for corruption, money laundering, lying and dishonesty.

What Supreme Court can decide on this point.

Actually this case is a bigger problem for the Supreme Court than for Nawaz Sharif. The reason is TV media particularly ARY channel and others has provided documentary evidence of money laundering, corruption and dishonesty of Nawaz Sahrif that people have no doubt about the allegations raised by Imran Khan are true and factual. If the Supreme Court do not care about these evidences then Supreme Court will lose its credibility so they will take middle of the road option.

Justice Azmat Saeed Khosa once said they will make the decision according to constitution and laws. He did not say they will make the decision on the basis of justice. So hanging of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was according to law but not according to justice. Supreme Court find explanations to support their decisions when they want to favor any party.

The Bench will pacify the public by either enforcing Article 62 and 63 on Nawaz Sharif directly or suggesting him to leave his position as prime minister till the inquiry is complete. That will be a polite way saying him to resign. For rest of the matters they will be handed over to Commission. History of Commissions in Pakistan is not very commendable. Nawaz Sahrif will be satisfied because he may have some leverage to manipulate the commission members.

As usual there will be lot of bhashan in the decision report but that will be just fillers will not have much effect on the politics or corruption, malpractices and bad governance of the government. If you recall Anwar Zahir Jamali criticized the government that Pakistan has become a kingdom and talked about corruption but he did not send even a single person to jail. Nasirul Mulik gave the verdict the 2013 elections were fair and there was no rigging.

What will be Nawaz Sharif’s strategy after the decision.

If the Bench takes Option 1 or 2 (Shailkh Rasheed’s petition) then Nawaz Sharif will have to leave the position of prime minister. Some time back there was a talk that PMLN is looking for a replacement. Right now the decision seems to be first resists (even use violence) the implementation of Supreme Court decision then finally announce the new election. Chances are the decision report will suggest a lot of over hauling of different institutions of the country but Nawaz Sharif government will be least interested in doing that. In spite of the dent Imran Khan has made on the political position of Nawaz Sharif the elections system in Pakistan is so corrupt that Nawaz Sharif will prefer to go to elections with out any election reforms.

All in all we do not see much coming out of the Panama Case verdict other than smoke and very little meat, if any.

Saeed uz Zaman Siddiqui as Sind Governor?

Saeed-uz-Zaman Siddiqui (in the Center) New Governor of Sind. Photo Samaa TV

Frail Saeed uz Zaman Siddiqui in the Center. Photo courtesy Samaa TV.

Appointment of Saeed uz Zaman Siddiqui as Sind governor has been challenged in the High Court. Applicant’s plea is that he is not in good health and fit to fulfill governor’s responsibilities.

On the other hand governor said he will try to serve all the segments of the province equally. Our comment is that if he takes care of himself on government’s expenses that would be enough.

When people openly criticized Nawaz Sharif’s decision to appoint a man as governor whose mental faculties are questionable then Noon League issued a statement saying we were not aware of Siddiqui’s  health status.

You can imagine the ignorance of the person who proposed, nominated or selected Saeed uz Zaman Siddiqui as a governor.