Mian Saqib Nisar Allowed Sharifs to Leave the Country to Celebrate Eid in London

mian_saqib_nisar

Mian Saqib Nisar, Chief Justice of Pakistan Supreme Court

Today, June 11, 2018 while a hearing in Lahore Registry Mian Saqib Nisar, Chief Justice of Pakistan Supreme Court has allowed Sharifs to leave the country to celebrate Eid with Kalsoom Nawaz.

Here are a couple of questions for the people who know Nawaz Sharif and his family really well.

If Sharifs don’t return then who will be responsible.
If Sharifs delay their return with the strategy to delay the completion of the case then who will be responsible.

Our take on this issue is that NAB has requested current caretaker govt. to put Sharifs’ names on ECL. The govt. is reluctant because the present caretaker setup is an extension of the previous Sharif mafia govt.

We believe NAB by sending two letters to govt. to put Nawaz Sharif, Maryam and her husband’s names on ECL has shifted the responsibility on the govt. if they don’t return.

We believe chief justice is not only helping rather he is supporting Sharifs to escape the case. The case in the NAB will never finish Sharifs will never get the punishment that is what Sharifs want this is what Mian Saqib Nisar has presented them on a silver platter.

Nawaz Sharif can make a number of excuses to delay or not to return to Pakistan at least before the election so his punishment may not have any negative effect on the election results.

Is there any collusion between Sharifs and chief justice? It is very easy to draw the result.

We will not surprise and nobody should if and when we hear that Kalsoom Nawaz’s condition is very serious. It will be a solid excuse for Nawaz Sharif not to return or delay his return.

Purpose of Sharifs and Mian Saqib Nisar is achieved.

 

Supreme Court of Pakistan has Allowed Criminals, Terrorists, Money Launderers, Loan Defaulters, National of Any Country to Participate and Get Elected to National Parliament

supreme_court_of_pakistan
The Constitution of Pakistan requires honest and capable people to be elected to the national parliament. For this purpose, Constitution has included necessary criteria for the prospective candidates to meet to participate in the national election.
Also, the Constitution gives the right to every Pakistani to know about the candidates’ background and other particulars before voting. To fulfill this requirement Article 62 and 63 were included in the Constitution.

To fulfill the requirements of Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution the prospective candidate has to provide the following information in the Nomination Form;

  1. The candidate must not have any criminal record.
  2. He must not be a loan defaulter.
  3. He must not be a utility bills defaulter.
  4. He has to declare his assets under his own name, his wife’s name as well as children’s’ name inside the country as well as outside of the country.
  5. He has to declare what other nationality he has if any other than Pakistani. Constitution does not allow dual national or national of any other country to be in the national parliament of Pakistan.
  6. His education level.
  7. His sources of income.
  8. His bank accounts within Pakistan as well as outside of Pakistan.
  9. His travels during the last three years and who paid the expenses.

Under the Election Act 2017 which was approved by the National Parliament, the prospective candidates don’t have to provide any data mentioned above.

We believe this Act was against the basic rights of the people of Pakistan also against the spirit of the fundamental component of democracy.

In December 2017 a petition was filed in Islamabad High Court to make this Act revoked and previous and Nomination Form which was used in the Election 2013 should be reinstated. Justice Aiysha Malik gave the verdict yesterday and asked the Election Commission to reinstate the Election 2013 nomination form.

Today Supreme Court declared Islamabad High Court’s decision null and void.

We believe without any reservations that this action of Supreme Court is total ignorance of the Constitution and clearly to support Sharif-Zardari mafia.

 

What Should be The Disqualification Period Under Article 62 (1) F of the Constitution of Pakistan?

supreme_court_of_pakistan

Supreme Court of Pakistan is going to announce its verdict which was saved on February 15, 2018 on this issue related to the disqualification period under Article 62 (1) F at 11AM today (13 April 2018). Nawaz Sharif (PMLN) and Jahangir Tareen Khan (PTI) were disqualified under this Article.

What is going to be the decision of the Supreme Court? For how long Nawaz Sharif and Jahangir Tareen will be disqualified?

Short answer is we don’t know. 

However, since Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification is involved, therefore based on the previous sympathetic attitude of Supreme Court towards Nawaz Sharif, our inclination is that period will be minimum possible. 

During the case proceeding an eight year period was suggested by the attorneys involved in the case. Previously, people who were disqualified under Article 62 (1) F, they were disqualified for life. What verdict Supreme Court gives in this case we will have to wait and see.

Constitutional law experts have varied kind of interpretation of this Article and the punishment of disqualification. And every person seems to make us believe that he is right in his explanation. Obviously Supreme Court has the final say so we will have to wait for their verdict.

Nawaz Sharif in Power


nawaz sharif power

Nawaz Sharif has come into power. This is bad news for Pervez Musharraf.

Nawaz Sharif at the helm of power and Inftikhar Mohammad Chaudary as Chief Justice what else combination could be well aligned for Nawaz Sharif and Nawaz Sharif to take his revenge.

Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudary is going to retire probably by the end of this year so the chances are the cases against Pervez Musharraf will be expedited.

Dual Nationality Case – Eleven Members of Parliament and Senate Disqualified


Parliament-and-Senate-Disqualified

Supreme Court of Pakistan gave a historic decision yesterday on dual nationality case and disqualified eleven members of Parliament and Senate including Rahman Malik. This decision is much appreciated by all walks of life in Pakistan except Peoples Party. There is nothing special about that. They will criticize the judges and their decision on one hand then on the other hand they will say we always respect the apex court and its decisions.

Samsaam Bukhari, a state minister in the PPP government said they (meaning PPP is not satisfied with this decision). Funny thing is that having or keeping dual nationality is prohibited in the Constitution of Pakistan. But nobody challenged it in the court of law. Now PPP and PMLN both blame apex court that court did not object to Moin Qureshi’s status when he was a caretaker prime minister. If the Supreme Court did not take action at that time then why these politicians who are objecting now took the case to the Court. This is criticism for the sake of criticism.

Fuad Chaudary who changed his loyalty some time back from APML (All Pakistan Muslim League headed by Pervez Musharraf) to Peoples Party said on this decision that why the Supreme Court did not take action on PLMN’s members of parliament or senate who have dual nationality. First, I don’t know all the disqualified members belong to PPP, if there are PMLN’s members who have dual nationality and Fuad Chaudary knows about them then why he is not going to go to court or at least announce their names so people can see his truthfulness.

Supreme Court has instructed Election Commission of Pakistan to ask all the members of Parliament and Senate to provide declaration about their nationality. That should resolve the issue.

I think now the most important thing is how long it will take to implement Supreme Court’s decision.

Let us hope for good!

New Law on Contempt of Court


New-Law-on-Contempt-of-Court

Primarily the purpose of this new law is to save and protect Raja Pervez Ashraf by trying to divert the attention of Supreme Court or indulge it to other issues which will end up delaying the case of Raja Pervez Asharf. In the end, buying time till election.

Obviously, PPP don’t want to write the letter and these are all their delaying tactics. This is how our politicians’ character is. So if the country is going down the hill it should not surprise you. Basically, according to this new law, what we are saying is that if the government read prime minister and his cronies  don’t write the letter to Swiss authorities then it will not be a contempt of court. If Supreme Court still take any action then it will take months may be years before some decision comes out. This is PPP’s tactics to buy the time till the elections.

In other words this new law is promulgated to benefit people and not the country. Do you consider such politicians as honest or loyal to the country?

This is shameful that ANP, PML-Q and MQM supported this new law.  At least ANP and MQM were considered parties who follow have some principles. But unfortunately each party is looking forward for their own benefit in the coming election and not of the country.

One political commentator on PTV channel suggested to Supreme Court that they should ask their registrar to write the letter to Swiss authorities and not insist on prime minister to write that letter. Do you think a commentator on PTV channel will say anything else?

Another commentator who claims he has inside information and his chirya (bird)brings the information to him which he broadcast to the nation on a TV channel suggested that Supreme Court should not insists on this issue and let the time pass till elections. I have summed up his comments. He claims the Supreme Court is going out of his limits.  Both of these commentators do not see anything wrong with behavior of prime minister(s) or PPP government rather they blame Supreme Court. If prime minister and his cronies don’t obey courts they will be protected if an ordinary person on the street don’t obey he will be criminal.

Democracy Zindabad. This democracy is Pakistani style.

Malik Riyaz in The Supreme Court


Malik-Riyaz-in-The-Supreme-Court

A week ago Malik Riyaz stated in the Supreme Court that he met with Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudary at his request during the time when Chief Justice was inactivated from his post and a movement was going on to re-instate him.

Malik Riyaz further stated that he helped the movement whatever way he could. I read his statement as, he invested money to help them to achieve the movement’s objectives with the belief he would get some benefit later. If this is true then Chief Justice along with Aitazaz Ahsan and Ali Ahmed Kurd should be asked what Malik Riyaz’s contribution to the movement was?

Another person who really got the benefit of the return of Chief Justices is Nawaz Sharif of PML-N. His case was reverted and he was declared innocent in plane hijack case. Chief Justice was and is against Pervaiz Musharraf. Nawaz Sharif was and is against Pervaiz Musharraf. Did Nawaz Sharif also invest money in this movement? It was called lawyers’ movement. We think lawyers were used at the front to meet the objectives of others like Nawaz Sharif. So nobody should have any doubt on the collusion against Pervez Musharraf of these two men.

During the last Hajj season a plane load of journalists, TV anchors and others was paid by Malik Riyaz. That should also be investigated. Dr. Shahid Masood and others have openly said on TV programs that it should be investigated and suggested journalists should do this job by themselves to show their hoesty instead of any commission or court that which journalist is on who’s payroll.
Journalists were also given land plots by the PPP governments.
Did the journalists returned this favor in pro-PPP government
programs, comments and reports?

Recently, a couple of incidents happened a journalist blamed another of his colleagues that he accepted some sort of favor etc. That is good. Probably this is one way to know the truth but our best guess is that journalists will not speak out the truth.
There is another very easy way for public to guess and in fact judge the affiliation of journalists and TV anchors.  Here are few examples which you may have come across and draw your own conclusions.

A TV anchor praised Benazir Income Support program while everybody knows this is one of the scams PPP is running.
A TV anchor praised Nawaz Sharif for his contribution to democracy while everybody knows he is the person who attacked Supreme Court building in his time. He is also a coward person who ran away from Pakistan. Sharif family signed a document before escaping to Saudi Arabia but later denied. In other words he lied that he has not signed any papers to stay away from Pakistan for ten years until Saad Hariri and Chief Intelligence of Saudi Arabia came to Pakistan and showed the agreement in a press conference.

A TV anchor asked Imran Khan how you can be successful; your party is a one man show. She was one of the persons who went to Hajj on PPP expenses. She admitted in another program when the host cornered her. Listen to her answer. She said she thought this trip is arranged and paid by Saudi government.