Chief Justice Becomes Upset Because His Flight Delayed


Chief-Justice-Becomes-Upset

Today Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudary became upset when his flight from Lahore to Karachi was late at Lahore airport. He called PIA officials and yelled at them.
Should he have done that?

Should PIA officials have presented to him?

The answer to both of these questions is NO.

PIA officials are not accountable to him so they should not have presented to him. Just because he is Chief Justice he cannot start yelling at anybody he likes. If he has any complaint he should have taken proper channel and report to this thing. He is not PIA’s boss. On the other hand PIA definitely don’t have very laudable record of flight punctuality but that does not mean any person in high position start giving hard time to employees particularly Chief Justice.

He also said, as reported in the news, if he is upset what about other people. It seems our Chief Justice have just landed today in Pakistan and he don’t know the condition of PIA.
Why doesn’t he take a suo moto action against PIA chief executive or better yet against Defense Minister since PIA falls under his responsibility?

Altaf Hussain’s Referendum


Altaf Hussain’s Referendum

An interview of Altaf Hussain was broadcast yesterday on a TV channel.  There was nothing impressive nor did it show any political wisdom. However, today MQM issued a statement that there should be a referendum as Altaf Hussain wanted people of Pakistan to determine whether they want Qaid-e-Azam’s Pakistan or Pakistan which Taliban wanted.

Let us assume there is a referendum and majority of the people wanted Qaid-e-Azam’s Pakistan. Then what Altaf Hussain is going to do and what conclusion he wants to draw. And if the result is opposite then what conclusion he will reach and what policies he will change since MQM claims now as a national political party.
This is just a political gimmick of no value to nation and no value in support of democratic system in Pakistan. In fact this is an indication Altaf Hussain has nothing to say.
Now the question is, what is the purpose of elections? That is the way for people to vote and decide which political parties want Qaid-e-Azam’s Pakistan and which political parties want to implement Islam of their definition.

If Altaf Hussain has told the people who in his opinion wants to follow Qaid-e-Azam’s philosophy and who is not then maybe we can say he is serving a purpose.

Now let see what MQM is doing. MQM is collaborating with that political party who laid the foundation of religious hatred by involving the State into religious things and start defining who is Muslim and who is not. Did Qaid-e-Azam say the State will decide who is Muslaim and who is not. Is the present constitution of Pakistan fulfills Qaid-e-Azam’s dreams? If not then Altaf Hussain should start working on that issue.  If a ruling party can define the definition of Muslim then why other people cannot define Islam. So Taliban is the net result of Pakistani State’s involvement in religious affairs. The State should not have anything to do with the religion in general or Islam in specific.

Fakharuddin G. Ibrahim Said


Fakharuddin-G.-Ibrahim-Said

Muslim is killing Muslim on the name of Islam in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Fakharuddin G. Ibrahim said in a interview the other on PTV network. I think it is something Pakistani nation needs to pay attention.

New Law on Contempt of Court


New-Law-on-Contempt-of-Court

Primarily the purpose of this new law is to save and protect Raja Pervez Ashraf by trying to divert the attention of Supreme Court or indulge it to other issues which will end up delaying the case of Raja Pervez Asharf. In the end, buying time till election.

Obviously, PPP don’t want to write the letter and these are all their delaying tactics. This is how our politicians’ character is. So if the country is going down the hill it should not surprise you. Basically, according to this new law, what we are saying is that if the government read prime minister and his cronies  don’t write the letter to Swiss authorities then it will not be a contempt of court. If Supreme Court still take any action then it will take months may be years before some decision comes out. This is PPP’s tactics to buy the time till the elections.

In other words this new law is promulgated to benefit people and not the country. Do you consider such politicians as honest or loyal to the country?

This is shameful that ANP, PML-Q and MQM supported this new law.  At least ANP and MQM were considered parties who follow have some principles. But unfortunately each party is looking forward for their own benefit in the coming election and not of the country.

One political commentator on PTV channel suggested to Supreme Court that they should ask their registrar to write the letter to Swiss authorities and not insist on prime minister to write that letter. Do you think a commentator on PTV channel will say anything else?

Another commentator who claims he has inside information and his chirya (bird)brings the information to him which he broadcast to the nation on a TV channel suggested that Supreme Court should not insists on this issue and let the time pass till elections. I have summed up his comments. He claims the Supreme Court is going out of his limits.  Both of these commentators do not see anything wrong with behavior of prime minister(s) or PPP government rather they blame Supreme Court. If prime minister and his cronies don’t obey courts they will be protected if an ordinary person on the street don’t obey he will be criminal.

Democracy Zindabad. This democracy is Pakistani style.

Malik Riyaz in The Supreme Court


Malik-Riyaz-in-The-Supreme-Court

A week ago Malik Riyaz stated in the Supreme Court that he met with Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudary at his request during the time when Chief Justice was inactivated from his post and a movement was going on to re-instate him.

Malik Riyaz further stated that he helped the movement whatever way he could. I read his statement as, he invested money to help them to achieve the movement’s objectives with the belief he would get some benefit later. If this is true then Chief Justice along with Aitazaz Ahsan and Ali Ahmed Kurd should be asked what Malik Riyaz’s contribution to the movement was?

Another person who really got the benefit of the return of Chief Justices is Nawaz Sharif of PML-N. His case was reverted and he was declared innocent in plane hijack case. Chief Justice was and is against Pervaiz Musharraf. Nawaz Sharif was and is against Pervaiz Musharraf. Did Nawaz Sharif also invest money in this movement? It was called lawyers’ movement. We think lawyers were used at the front to meet the objectives of others like Nawaz Sharif. So nobody should have any doubt on the collusion against Pervez Musharraf of these two men.

During the last Hajj season a plane load of journalists, TV anchors and others was paid by Malik Riyaz. That should also be investigated. Dr. Shahid Masood and others have openly said on TV programs that it should be investigated and suggested journalists should do this job by themselves to show their hoesty instead of any commission or court that which journalist is on who’s payroll.
Journalists were also given land plots by the PPP governments.
Did the journalists returned this favor in pro-PPP government
programs, comments and reports?

Recently, a couple of incidents happened a journalist blamed another of his colleagues that he accepted some sort of favor etc. That is good. Probably this is one way to know the truth but our best guess is that journalists will not speak out the truth.
There is another very easy way for public to guess and in fact judge the affiliation of journalists and TV anchors.  Here are few examples which you may have come across and draw your own conclusions.

A TV anchor praised Benazir Income Support program while everybody knows this is one of the scams PPP is running.
A TV anchor praised Nawaz Sharif for his contribution to democracy while everybody knows he is the person who attacked Supreme Court building in his time. He is also a coward person who ran away from Pakistan. Sharif family signed a document before escaping to Saudi Arabia but later denied. In other words he lied that he has not signed any papers to stay away from Pakistan for ten years until Saad Hariri and Chief Intelligence of Saudi Arabia came to Pakistan and showed the agreement in a press conference.

A TV anchor asked Imran Khan how you can be successful; your party is a one man show. She was one of the persons who went to Hajj on PPP expenses. She admitted in another program when the host cornered her. Listen to her answer. She said she thought this trip is arranged and paid by Saudi government.

Seven Persons Have Died During Doctors’ Strike


Doctors-on-strike

News say seven persons have died during the strike of young doctors in Punjab.

TV news anchors along with Khadim-e-Aala are blaming doctors for these deaths. What a logic.  Khadim-e-Aala has arranged to employ some new doctors. Also, they have requested Army to send some doctors to serve in the government hospitals . That is good. The question is Chief Minister did not know that due to doctors’ strike some unpleasant incidents like deaths will happen.  Then why he did not put his action plan into motion immediately. Why he is blaming doctors now of these deaths.

A case has also been registered against doctors for death of a child. We don’t know any doctor is named in the FIR or doctors as a group are assigned for this death. Let us see the action and decision of the court on this issue. That would be interesting to note.

Should The Doctors Have Right to Strike?


Should-The-Doctors-Have-Right-to-Strike

The answer is Yes.

It is not the question of serving humanity as TV news channels and their anchors are portraying doctors committing crime against the humanity.

Basically, any civilian citizen must have the right to negotiate his terms of employment. You can agree or disagree with those demands but they must have the right.  Doctors should not be any exception. This is a total inability and failure of the Punjab government not able to settle down the issues on the table. This is also not appropriate for the TV news anchors to pass their personal comments and portray the doctors strike as a crime or action against the people’s sufferings. Why the striking doctors are only responsible for the suffering of the people. Why not we should blame Khadim-e-Aala for his inability to tackle the issues amicably. 

Do the doctors have any other means to fight for their rights?

Again, this question can be raised that their demands are not acceptable or what ever but in any case you must give them right to take action within the laws and constitution of the country.